(SecurityWeek – Eduard Kovacs) – An unusually high volume of malicious internal reconnaissance and lateral movement have been observed in the manufacturing industry, which experts believe is a result of the rapid convergence between IT and OT networks.
The data comes from the 2018 Spotlight Report on Manufacturing released on Wednesday by threat detection company Vectra. The report is based on observations from another report released on Wednesday by the company, the 2018 Black Hat Edition of the Attacker Behavior Industry Report, which shows attacker behavior and trends across nine industries.
The Attacker Behavior Industry Report shows that Vectra has detected a significant number of threats in manufacturing companies. This industry has generated the third highest number of detections, after the education and energy sectors.
The cybersecurity firm has focused on botnets, command and control (C&C) traffic, data exfiltration, reconnaissance and lateral movement.
In the case of manufacturing organizations, it discovered a significant volume of malicious internal behavior, which suggests that adversaries are already inside the network. For example, Vectra noted that in many instances there was twice as much lateral movement as C&C traffic.
“These behaviors reflect the ease and speed with which attacks can proliferate inside manufacturing networks due to the large volume of unsecured IIoT devices and insufficient internal access controls,” Vectra said in its report. “Most manufacturers do not invest heavily in security access controls for business reasons. These controls can interrupt and isolate manufacturing systems that are critical for lean production lines and digital supply chain processes.”
Register for SecurityWeek’s 2018 ICS Cyber Security Conference
Many factories connect their industrial internet of things (IIoT) systems to regular computers and enterprise applications for data telemetry and remote management purposes. The use of widely used protocols instead of proprietary protocols makes it easier for malicious actors to infiltrate networks, spy on the targeted organization, and steal data, Vectra said.
According to the company, a recently observed spike in internal reconnaissance in the manufacturing sector was the result of internal darknet scans and SMB account scans. Internal darknet scans are when a device on the network looks for internal IP addresses that do not exist, while SMB account scans occur when a host quickly uses multiple accounts via the SMB protocol.
“Manufacturing networks consist of many gateways that communicate with smart devices and machines. These gateways are connected to each other in a mesh topology to simplify peer-to-peer communication. Cyberattackers leverage the same self-discovery used by peer-to-peer devices to map a manufacturing network in search of critical assets to steal or damage,” Vectra said.
As for lateral movement, the company has seen a wide range of activities, but the most common are SMB brute-force attacks, suspicious Kerberos clients, and automated replication, which occurs when an internal host sends similar payloads to multiple systems on the network.
“IIoT systems make it easy for attackers to move laterally across a manufacturing network, jumping across non-critical and critical subsystems, until they find a way to complete their exploitative missions,” the firm explained.
Reconnaissance, Lateral Movement Rise in Manufacturing Firms
(SecurityWeek - Eduard Kovacs) - An unusually high volume of malicious internal reconnaissance and lateral movement have been observed in the manufacturing industry, which experts believe is a result of the rapid convergence between IT and OT networks. The data comes from the 2018 Spotlight Report on Manufacturing released on Wednesday by threat detection company Vectra. The report is based on observations from another report released on Wednesday by the company, the 2018 Black Hat Edition of the Attacker Behavior Industry Report, which shows
ICS Anomaly Detection: Finding the Right Needle in the Relevant Electric Haystack
By Edgard Capdevielle, CEO of Nozomi Networks Power generation, substation and electric grid operators and many other critical infrastructure sectors typically use equipment from a heterogenous assortment of vendors. This equipment runs thousands of real-time processes generating a huge volume of data. Increasing the interconnectedness and digitization of these systems is a pillar of improved operational efficiencies, however, it isn’t risk free. Analyzing and monitoring this data to detect anomalies that might be caused by a cyberattack is akin to searching for
Critical Infrastructure Attacks Drive Startup & Innovation Opportunities
By: Rick Grinnell, co-founder and managing partner of Glasswing Ventures. In this modern connected age, there’s no shortage of risks to fret about. I hate to add one more, but cyberattacks against utilities and power plants have recently rocketed to the top of the list of major security concerns. For instance, a June report from ESET released new research revealing that the Ukrainian power grid was taken down in late 2015 by the Win32/Industroyer malware. This malware has been considered the biggest threat to
DHS Releases ICS-CERT 2016 Assessment Summary Report
By: Eduard Kovacs (SecurityWeek) - The assessments conducted by the U.S. Industrial Control Systems Cyber Emergency Response Team (ICS-CERT) in 2016 showed that inadequate boundary protection has remained the most prevalent weakness in critical infrastructure organizations. ICS-CERT conducted 130 assessments in the fiscal year 2016, which is more than in any previous year. Monitor newsletters published by ICS-CERT this year show that it has already conducted 74 assessments in the first half of 2017. Assessments are offered to both government organizations and private sector companies
What Modular, Network-based ICS Threats Mean to Your Systems
By Cameron Camp, Security Researcher, ESET Industroyer, the recent complex malware targeting industrial control systems, offers attackers a modular complex way to attack systems like the power grid. What are the implications of this? For years, adversaries have been quietly testing the defenses of bulk critical infrastructure like gas and oil systems, hydroelectric dams and the power grid. In recent years, starting with Stuxnet in 2010, more focused attempts at directly manipulating industrial systems have started to gain prominence, including Industroyer, which
How Vulnerable are Our Industrial Control Systems? What We Learned From ICS Attacks of 2016
Multiple cyberattacks on critical infrastructure facilities in 2016 resulted in mere inconvenience or embarrassment. How long can dumb luck keep us from harm? By Michael Shalyt, VP Product, APERIO Systems When the U.S. Energy Department released a nearly 500 page report this month warning of an “imminent” threat to the electrical grid, it was the latest reminder of just how dependent our day-to-day existence is on critical infrastructure networks — from power grids and water supplies to transportation networks and more. In 2016, attackers clearly